Juvenile Offenders-When Kids Get Life

| August 20, 2015

The justice system in the US is mandated to offer justice and fairness in the judicial process through provision of justice to the victims. The structures established plays a significant role in ensuring justice is served and fairness is provided. Also, the judicial system in highly inclined to the offences made and the corresponding decisions are hugely based on the magnitude of the crime or the offence committed. In this case, the offering justice is reflected across the community without considering age or the background of the offenders. Therefore, juvenile cases are high in the US and based on the records the number of juveniles in jails in significantly high. Imprisoning juvenile is geared towards offering justice, fairness as well as accountability in the society towards maintaining rule of law (Siegel, & Welsh, 2014). Therefore, the US established legal structures that offered justice without providing juvenile special treatment. In addition, parole is not awarded to juvenile in the US and for capital crime life sentence is inevitable. Firm this perspective coupled with high criminal activities among minors and child abuse, US has become highly inflated with juveniles sentenced to life sentences.
Capital imprisonment is highly associated with capital crimes like murder as well as killing in cold blood in the US. In order to offer justice to the victims as well as establish a platform for accountability of one’s behaviour in the community as well as encouraging social co-existence. In the US this is practiced across different age groups either minor or adults. However, adults can be released into the society through paroles(Carmen, & Trulson, 2005). The process involves comprehensive monitoring as well as rehabilitation to facilitate re-entry into the community. Considering Colorado judicial system the approach deployed in offering justice especially involving juvenile is identified as harsh. For instance juvenile serving a life sentence cannot be release on parole but remain bar for. This approach is not only considered harsh but also primitive. In addition, the adults are treated similarly as adults in the prisons rather than offering special avenues of correcting behaviour.
The case of life sentence in Colorado is harsh to the juvenile and unbearable considering not parole is possible and serves in line with the adult prisoners. Considering in most cases life sentences are associated with prolonged abuse by the victims or constant violence considering situation culminating to the crime should be evaluated(Siegel, &Welsh, 2014). This can offer a different approach towards re-correction of behaviour which can entail rehabilitation and counselling. However, the approach cannot be termed are helpful or fix the juvenile crime problem based on the mental disturbance among the minors as well as the underlying situations.
The judicial system is geared towards offering justice as well as fairness through implementation of the laws established. Notably, the world is associated with changes that are critical to the society as well as critical in embracing social co-existence. In this case, reforms in the judicial system are termed inevitable considering the wide range of background and social orientation. Crime associated with juvenile has been significantly high in the US and those serving life sentence are similarly high(Siegel, & Welsh, 2014). However, comprehensive evaluation on the situations, scenarios as well as circumstances culminating in capital offences among juvenile highlights propagated or induced situations like abusive parents or guardians. Therefore, reforms in relation to the juvenile cases were introduced to improve on fairness during judicial process. Considering on the reforms the major beneficiaries involved the offenders considering established avenues to offer parole rather than mandatory life sentencing. This established a platform for offenders to be released but undergo rehabilitation process.
Considering the VIDEO When Kids Get Life, although the juveniles were found guilty of the capital offence from the scenario culminating to the crime it can be argued that they were victims. Offenders were found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment however comprehensive evaluation on the situation can result to a lower sentence. Making the judgment should reflect on the situations that resulted to crime committed by the juvenile. Mostly minors committing capital crime are forced by a wide range of underlying scenarios(Carmen, &Trulson, 2005). This can be highlighted from the VIDEO where juvenile are victims of violence and abuse from either parents or guardians in the community. For instance, Jacob Ind was found guilty of killing his parent and sentenced for life without parole after being abused for years. Also, Erik sentenced for life although did not take part in killing the mother after abusing him and his brother for a prolonged period. In this case, the two juvenile were also juvenile and considering life sentencing seemed unfair.
Considering the established legal structures and the authorities involving trying a minor as juvenile or an adult the district attorney is mandated to make the decision. However, from a personal perspective, the district attorney should only table the evidence but the judge should make the decision whether a minor will be charged as a juvenile or an adult.
Considering the situations culminating to juveniles committing capital crimes coupled with the nature of minors that they cannot make decisive decision, the law should change to enable treatment of juvenile differently from adults. This should not affect the victims considering justice will be served but punished or possibility of parole should be based on the nature of the crime rather than a closed approach (Carmen, & Trulson, 2005). The family members of the juvenile offenders should be considered to gather background information on the offender. This is critical in offering fairness, understanding mental condition of the offender as well as giving avenues of parole.
References
Bikel, O. (2007). Juvenile Offenders-When Kids Get Life.
Carmen, R., &Trulson, C. (2005).Juvenile Justice: The System, Process and Law. New York: Cengage Learning.
Siegel, S., &Welsh, B. (2014).Juvenile Delinquency: Theory, Practice, and Law. New York: Cengage Learning.

Get a 5 % discount on an order above $ 150
Use the following coupon code :
My2020Discount
Examine the principles of critical thought in relation to the chosen societal concern, and consider the importance of ethics, moral reasoning, a research-based process to search for truth, and the advantages of information technology in gathering data
Drug Offenders: Punishment or Treatment.

Category: Criminology

Our Services:
Order a customized paper today!