Healing Hospital: A Daring Paradigm

| February 18, 2015
Read all readings for this module and research other articles or websites associated with the healing hospital paradigm. As you read,
consider how this paradigm might influence your philosophy of care giving. Any hospital with a healing component to its mission can be
used as a resource. Write an essay of 1,100 words in which you address the following: 1. Describe the components of healing hospitals
and their relationship to spirituality. 2. What are the challenges of creating a healing environment in light of the barriers and
complexities of the hospital environment? 3. Include at least one biblical passage or parable that you believe supports the concept of
a healing hospital and provide rationale for your selection. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA
Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Remember that Wikipedia is not considered a scholarly
source. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students
should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for
successful completion of the assignment. Please plagiarized paper is not allowed. This class uses Rubric for grading it is attached
below. Please use the 100% aspect of rubric for this paper. Healing Hospital: A Daring Paradigm 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than
Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content 40.0 %Comprehension of concepts of a Healing
Hospital Reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lacks the ability to apply information. Displays a lack of comprehension but
attempts to apply information. Presentation of material does not meet minimal requirements of the assignment. Demonstrates no critical
thinking aspects. Exhibits comprehension of the material and attempts to integrate it with outside material. Information represents
basic thought and formulation of Healing Hospital concepts, values, and practices. Demonstrates integrative comprehension. Student
exhibits thorough and thoughtful processing of material. Evidentiary support is creatively interwoven and presented in a manner that
supports the writer?s position and perspective on Healing Hospital concepts and patterns. Demonstrates integrative comprehension and
thoughtful application of concepts surrounding the Healing Hospital and circumstances involving application in real world situations.
Presentation of material and components include expanded and unique perspective relative to Healing Hospital patterns and value. 30.0
%Coverage of subject matter. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject
matter with large gaps in presentation. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Comprehensive coverage of
subject matter is evident. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0
%Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing thesis and/or main claim. Thesis and/or main
claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the
arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the
thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not
justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the thesis and/or main claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses
noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of thesis and/or main claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are
obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of thesis and/or main claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose.
Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of thesis and/or main claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources
are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive thesis and/or main claim in a distinctive and compelling
manner. All sources are authoritative. 5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface
errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of the meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are
used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register); sentence
structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.
Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard,
written, academic English. 10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used
appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor
errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are
correct. 5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as
appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are
inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although
some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and
citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources
is free of error. 100 %Total Weightage

Get a 5 % discount on an order above $ 150
Use the following coupon code :
2018DISC
Health Care Provider and Faith Diversity: Final Draft
Evidence Based Practice

Tags:

Category: Uncategorized

Our Services:
Order a customized paper today!