Hand hygeine

| May 21, 2015

 

Introduction (0 points)
purpose statement not included or not clear and/or no outline of paper (2 points)
unclear purpose statement and/or outline of paper (4 points)
clear purpose statement with outline of paper (5 points)
Well written purpose stateament with organized outline of paper
Student A:
Assessment to Determine Need & Purpose of Project (0 points)
missing significant criteria; anonymity not maintained (2 points)
some criteria missing; anonymity maintained (4 points)
all criteria included; anonymity maintained (5 points)
Criteria well described; anonymity maintained
Student B:
Literature Review (0 points)
< 6 scholarly sources; information not clearly written or relevant to project (4 points)
< 6 scholarly sources; some information not clearly written or relevant to project (8 points)
Somewhat clearly written; 6 scholarly sources (10 points)
Well written, 6 or > scholarly sources
Student C:
Plan/Design of Project
Outcome Goals
Teaching tools developed/used (2 points)
significant criteria missing and/or poorly developed short and long term goals (4 points)
most criteria addressed; short and long term goals need improvement (8 points)
all criteria included; well-developed short and long term goals; clearly written (10 points)
Criteria clearly addressed with well-developed short and long term goals and outcome criteria
Student D:
Implementation and Evaluation (2 points)
description lacks sufficient detail; short and long term goals not clearly linked to outcome data (4points)
Description of implementation/evaluation lacking detail; lacks clear link between short and long term goals and outcome data (8 points)
Description of implementation/evaluation; clear link between outcome data and short and long term goals (10 points)
Well written description of implementation and evaluation with clear link between data/goal achievement
Student A, B, C, D:
Summary/
Conclusion/
Personal Reflection (0 points)
Summary marginal or missing; lacks conclusions
No self-reflection done. (4 points)
Summary not clear; vague conclusions
Reflection only included strengths OR only included areas that could be improved but lacked suggestions for how to improve. Failed to mention feelings. (8 points)
Clearly written summary with conclusions based on what was learned from project.
Reflection included strengths of the presentation and areas that could be improved, but lacked suggestions, and lacked student’s feelings. (10 points)
Well written summary of paper; Conclusions based on what was learned from project included. Personal Reflection included feelings, areas that were strengths of the presentation and areas that could be improved, and suggestions for improvement.
APA
(Each student responsible for own product) (1 points)
APA not followed (3 points)
Basic APA marginally followed (4 points)
Effort to follow basic APA – minimal errors (5 points)
Basic APA followed well
Writing Quality
(Each student responsible for own product) (1 points)
Overall not well written (3 points)
Needs work regarding quality of writing (4 points)
Overall quality of writing high (5 points)
Excellent writing quality

Student A is to be the Project Leader and submit the final finished product in “final format”.
Each student is responsible for certain prescribed sections of the teaching project paper.
The maximum amount of points for each student possible is THIRTY (30) on the APA paper.

Do you want your   assignment written by the best essay experts? Click order now, and enjoy an amazing discount.

Get a 5 % discount on an order above $ 150
Use the following coupon code :
2018DISC
Outsourcing is a managerial tool used for organisational effectiveness
Interview

Tags:

Category: Uncategorized

Our Services:
Order a customized paper today!