Family Law

| February 28, 2014

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”adssa” metadata=”height: 126, width: 630″]
Order Details
PORTFOLIO QUESTIONS
QUESTION ONE
Critically discuss, in a legal context, a particular case that has either brought about a change in society’s attitudes in relation to a particular aspect of Family Law or which has reflected society’s change in attitude to a particular area, since 2000.
In particular, examine the role of the Judge in the case, against the findings made and assess whether this was a justified conclusion / position for the Judge to adopt.
You are free to choose which case to discuss, but your choice is subject to the approval of the Family Law tutor.
QUESTION TWO
‘Protecting children from harm is more important than the children’s right to autonomy in making decisions’. Discuss
QUESTION THREE
Given the importance of section 31 of the Children Act 1989, assess how the Supreme Court and the House of Lords before it have interpreted and applied this section.
[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”best” metadata=”height: 126, width: 630″]

Get a 5 % discount on an order above $ 150
Use the following coupon code :
2018DISC
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. Christopher Chad PARKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. No. PD-0250-05. -- April 12, 2006
How we should distinguish between the insane and non-insane automatism?

Tags:

Category: Legal Issues

Our Services:
Order a customized paper today!