ENG 123 Embry Riddle Aeronautical Module 6 True Race of Ancient Egyptians Paper DRAFT After reviewing Chapters 16 and 19 in your textbook, use your comple

ENG 123 Embry Riddle Aeronautical Module 6 True Race of Ancient Egyptians Paper DRAFT

After reviewing Chapters 16 and 19 in your textbook, use your completed outline in the previous activity to write a draft of the classical argument position paper.

You will also need to review the Paper Assignment section on the Classical Argument Position Paper Assignment Instructions page.

Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.

You are submitting your paper as a draft to Turnitin so that you can check the originality report, but the paper will not be stored in the Turnitin repository at this time.

This assignment will be graded for completion only. After you submit your draft assignment here for instructor feedback, you’ll also need to post your draft to the Module 6 Peer Reviews of Classical Argument Position Paper discussion.

PAPER ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION REQUIREMENT

This assignment requires you to write a position paper using the classical argument structure.

There are five requirements for the Classical Argument Position Paper:

Write a classical argument position paper of 750-850 words.
Include a title page, headers, and page numbers in correct APA format.
Cite at least four different sources in your paper.
Use the following organization for your paper:
Get the reader’s attention by means of an interesting, engaging introduction.
Give the necessary background information so the reader understands the issue.
Clearly state your position.
Provide a forecast of your main points in the paper.
Clearly state the reasons that support your position and support each reason with appropriate and sufficient evidence.
Summarize one major objection and effectively respond to it.
Provide a strong conclusion that summarizes your argument, calls for action and/or leaves a powerful impression.
Use appropriate APA style documentation for in-text citations and a separate references list at the end of the paper.

AND PEER REVIEW TO REVISED

After you submit your draft for the Classical Argument Position Paper, your paper will go through a peer review in the Module 6 Discussion. You will also conduct a peer review for two of your classmates.

Please review the following instructions regarding peer reviews:

To help you critique your classmates’ drafts, please review that they have done all of the following:

Written a classical argument position paper of 750-850 words.
Included a title page, headers, and page numbers in correct APA format.
Cited at least four different sources in the paper.
Used the following organization for the paper:
Got the reader’s attention by means of an interesting, engaging introduction.
Given the necessary background information so the reader understands the issue.
Clearly stated the position.
Provided a forecast of the main points in the paper.
Clearly stated the reasons that support the position and supported each reason with appropriate and sufficient evidence.
Summarized one major objection and effectively responded to it.
Provided a strong conclusion that summarized the argument, calls for action and/or leaves a powerful impression.
Used appropriate APA style documentation for in-text citations and a separate references list at the end of the paper.

Please consider the following attributes upon submission of your peer reviews:

Always reread your written observation before submission.
Give detailed responses that generate more in-depth conversations on the subject.
Remain professional; discuss the strengths/weaknesses of the submission.
Provide clear suggestions and praise when necessary.
State appropriate feedback.

Submit a Comment