Assignment 3 Assignment 3 Summative Test Blueprint (*This assignment must be approved by your professor before you can submit your summative assessment n

Assignment 3 Assignment 3

Summative Test Blueprint (*This assignment must be approved by your professor before you can submit your summative assessment next week, so be sure to plan accordingly.) Now that you have practiced writing questions at various levels of rigor, create a blueprint (table) of how you will construct your summative test for your unit. Refer back to your reading from Week 1. You must have three levels of rigor. How many questions will you have at each level for your standard? This should be a good representation of each level. Level 1 questions should NOT be the majority of your test. Remember, you are not yet creating your questions.

This is the standard: RL 4.4-Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including those that allude to significant characters found in mythology (e.g., Herculean).

You are not creating a test. I just need the blueprint for now.

All assignment has to be turn in to Turnitin. So please make it original.

The rubric is attached.

Criterion

Advanced

Proficient

Basic

Minimal

Content of

Blueprint

Summative Test

Blueprint outlines

more than 25

questions;

Blueprint displays

a focus on higher level

thinking with

more questions

identified at DOK

levels 2 and 3.

(30 pts.)

Summative Test

Blueprint outlines

the minimum of 25

questions;

Blueprint displays

an equal distribution

of questions at DOK

levels 1, 2, and 3.

(25.5 pts.)

Summative Test

Blueprint outlines

less than 25

questions;

Blueprint outlines a

minimum number of

questions at DOK

levels 2 and 3.

(21 pts.)

Summative Test

Blueprint outlines

less than 20

questions;

Blueprint outlines

a majority of the

questions at DOK

level 1.

(16.5 pts.)

APA –

compliant

formatting

Consistently

follows APA

format. There

is a properly

formatted and

accurate reference

page (NO errors)

(5 pts.)

Consistently follows

APA format. There

is a properly

formatted and

accurate reference

page (1-2 MINOR

errors).

(4.25 pts.)

Limited (3-5) APA

errors in APA

format including

title page, running

heads, citations,

quotations or

references.

(3.5 pts.)

More than 5 APA

errors in format

including title

page, running

heads, citations,

quotations or

references.

(2.75 pts.)

Mechanics

The presentation

demonstrates

exceptional use of

standard English

conventions

(mechanics, usage,

grammar and

syntax). NO

ERRORS.

(5 pts.)

The presentation

demonstrates

consistent use of

standard English

conventions

(mechanics, usage,

grammar and

syntax). (1-2

MINOR errors).

(4.25 pts.)

The presentation

demonstrates

inconsistent use of

standard English

conventions

(mechanics, usage,

grammar and

syntax). (3-5 errors).

(3.5 pts.)

The presentation

does NOT

demonstrate

use of standard

English

conventions

(mechanics,

usage, grammar

and syntax).

(More than

5 errors).

(2.75 pts.)

Submit a Comment

Open chat