9-23 to do

| September 25, 2015

Reading:

Read Chapter 6 from pdf. on Business Models 

Read Secondary reading on Corporate Models (under Module 2)

 

 

DQ 1: Based on Chapter 6, and Secondary Reading of ‘Corporate Models’

There are four components of a business model: Core Strategy, Strategic Resources, Partnership Network, and Customer interface. Which component of the business model do you feel gave Tata Motors, its real competitive edge? And which component of the its business model do you think could be a potential weakness?  For both parts please explain in detail, the reason for your answer. [Do not respond based on information that you find about the company on the Internet.  Your responses should be based on the reading]

 

DQ 2:Chapter 6: Please respond latest by Sat, 9/26; Posting early is always a good idea.

The Secondary Reading in Module 2 (under Course Documents) titled “ Hey I Just Work Here” is about 19-year old, Geoff Cook who starts a successful company out of his college dorm.  In Chapter 6 under business models is the concept of “ value chain.”   Discuss on what components of the value chain model does Geoff’s enterprise providevalue.  http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.03/school.html

 

Provide feedback to peer‘s DQs responses

DQ 1: I think that Tata Motors received a real competitive advantage by the core strategy part of the business model.  The core strategy of a business model is “the market scope and the basis for differentiation”. The core competency is “a resource or capability that serves as the source of a firm’s competitive advantage over its rivals. It is a significant unique skill or capability that transcends products or markets, and makes a significant contribution to the customers perceived benefits and it is difficult to imitate”.  The core competency of Tata Motors is their ability to remove the manufacturing of cars in factory only and have them made on their plants. Tata Motors is trying” to make their parts in Tata plants and then to send the car off the company’s assembly line much like bicycles.” The mechanics can keep the kits in the garages to make the cars and them as requested. “This new process will save 20% of the auto production cost” which will be Tata’s unique skill and will save the buyer money because the car will be a lot cheaper since they are trying to sell the car for $2,200 when the average car cost $6,600. The cost is considered the contribution to the customer as can be viewed as the benefit, as well as for Tata for making it cheaper for them to create the car. Because of the huge difference in price between the normal $6,600 price and the Tata car which will cost $2,200 the option to create a cheaper car will be really hard to do. I think that the part of the business model that could be a potential weakness is the  customer interference aspect. Because so many mechanics and Tata Motor car dealers will have access to the new cars, the customer experience can be damaged since the overall sale at a mechanic shop would be totally different than the experience at a regular mechanic shop.  The experience may be different because of who sells it to you and how they sell the car to you. At a mechanic shop the mechanic is more technical about the facts of the car pertaining to manufacturing, or mileage, as opposed to at the dealership the sales person is giving you a total run down of the car, he trying to sell you the car by any means necessary which may make the customer feel better about the purchase.

 

DQ 2: (I will send it to you next day.)

Title: Asking The Right Questions ,  By: Kripalani, Manjeet, Business Week, 0007-7135, August 22, 2005, Issue 3948
Database: Academic Search Premier
 
Section: THE NEW CORPORATE MODEL

INNOVATION

Asking The Right Questions

 

Contents
CARS ON DEMAND
RISING INCOMES
India’s Corporate Innovators

These Indian companies realized Western models won’t work

The main hall of the Science & Technology Museum in Shanghai was packed. More than 150 top executives of multinational companies had arrived at the invitation of IBM Chief Sam Palmisano to participate in IBM’s Business Leadership Forum, a high-level conference held on a different continent every May for the past three years. On the dais, Palmisano introduced the day’s speaker: Sunil Mittal, chairman and CEO of India’s premier mobile-services provider, Bharti Tele-Ventures Ltd. This company, said Palmisano, “is on a rocket to the moon.”

Why would IBM’s chief be in China lauding an Indian telco that few outside India had even heard of a short time ago? It’s not just because Bharti did a 10-year $750 million IT-outsourcing deal with IBM. It’s also because Bharti — one of the world’s fastest-growing telcos and the most capital-efficient — is one of the many Indian companies proving to be visionary in their fields. We’re not talking about the champions of Bangalore, innovative as they are. These trendsetters range from telco newcomers such as Bharti to established giants like the $18 billion Tata Group and even former state-run players like ICICI Bank. All are rethinking the way they manage assets, distribute products, and use technologies to create new services. India’s “rapid, incremental innovations,” in the words of John Hagel III, a business-strategy consultant and author of a recent book on India and China, The Only Sustainable Edge, can provide lessons to companies everywhere.

What characterizes the best of the Indian outfits? They’ve learned to question the basic concepts of their industries, an attitude born of collective experience. For decades after achieving independence in 1947, India imposed severe restrictions on the capital private companies could tap, the technologies they could import, and the foreign exchange they could hold. So the best ones learned how to devise ingenious, low-cost solutions to their problems and even reimagine industries such as software services.

Since Indian industry was unshackled from state strictures in 1991, it has accelerated the process of innovation to stress affordability and quality. Bharti is the largest mobile operator in India, with 12 million subscribers and a 22% market share. It earned a net profit of $330 million on sales of $1.8 billion for the fiscal year ending Mar. 31. CEO Mittal, 48, likes to tell investors that Bharti charges just 2 cents a minute for phone calls on its Airtel service — and pockets 1 cents of that.

Mittal realized that the Western model for mobile-phone businesses — building and maintaining huge, expensive cellular networks — wasn’t for Bharti, which wanted to keep costs down in any way possible while providing reliable service. So in February, 2004, Bharti became the largest telco in the world to try something truly radical. It outsourced its entire cellular network to its three existing equipment suppliers: Ericsson, Nokia, and Siemens — a $725 million, three-year deal. The move to “deep outsourcing” was revolutionary. Networks are as crucial to telecom players as engines are to auto makers. But it worked, and the effect on Bharti was profound. With executives no longer focused on managing the network, Bharti has turned its attention to marketing and customer service. In a year it has added 6 million subscribers — one-fourth of India’s annual subscriber growth and by far the fastest sign-up rate in India’s history. “It’s a big transformation, and it’s becoming a global model,” says Erik Oldmark, who runs marketing strategy worldwide for Ericsson. On Aug. 8, Bharti took its model one step further by outsourcing its call-center operations.

CARS ON DEMAND

Bharti was able to tap outside expertise to remake its business. The $18 billion Tata Group relies on outside knowhow as well — but in this case, it’s the traditional skills of India’s working class. Tata, a conglomerate, has long made sturdy trucks. But four years ago, Chairman Ratan Tata plunged into the passenger-car business despite much skepticism. The result was India’s first indigenously designed, developed, and produced car — the $6,600 Indica. Tata used all of India’s low-cost engineering skills to develop the car, at 60% of the usual cost of launching a new model. Now he has put his team to work on his dream project: a car that will sell for only $2,200. “I wanted to change the rules of the game,” Tata says. “I wanted to change the way business is done.”

The “people’s car” will use a combination of steel and composite plastic for its body, put together with industrial adhesive along with nuts and bolts. But what’s the business changer? Tata will attempt to do away with the traditional model of manufacturing solely in a factory and distributing exclusively through established dealers. The plan is to make the basic components of the car in Tata plants — and then to send the car off the company’s assembly line much like a bicycle, in a knocked-down kit form. These will be shipped across the country to Tata-trained franchisees. Some of them will be Tata Motors car dealers. But other franchisees may be any of India’s thousands of roadside garages.

The mechanics will keep the kits in their garages and assemble them on demand for customers — then service them as needed. “It will give an opportunity to young, capable people to create an enterprise,” says Tata. But the move will also save an estimated 20% of an auto’s production, experts say. “Tata’s plan makes the car a commodity,” says Kumar Bhattacharyya, director of Warwick Manufacturing Group at the University of Warwick in Britain.

If Ratan Tata’s plan works, he will have stripped away a layer of distribution and manufacturing costs. Other Indian companies are tackling different kinds of distribution costs — and blowing away traditional assumptions in the process. In the case of Indian Tobacco Co. (ITC), managers are aggressively seeking ways to eliminate the exploitative middlemen who buy, transport, and market Indian farmers’ produce.

Calcutta-based ITC is best known as a hotelier and as India’s largest producer of cigarettes. But it also sells fertilizer to farmers and buys their grain to make processed foods. For years, ITC conducted its business with farmers through a maze of intermediaries, from brokers to traders. So ITC’s head of international business, S. Sivakumar, thought of using e-commerce as a way to break the unhealthy hold of traders over the supply chain. In the initial experiment — begun four years ago in the central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh — Sivakumar set up computer kiosks in 20 villages and hired a well-known local farmer to run each kiosk. He and other farmers would access the company’s intranet — dubbed e-chaupal, for electronic “town square” — twice a day to check ITC’s own offer price for produce, as well as prices in the closest village market, in the state capital, in New Delhi, and on the Chicago commodities exchange. The site relayed daily weather conditions and educated users about new farming techniques worldwide. In the evening, the local children took free lessons on the computer. In return, the farmers would usually give ITC first dibs on their crops, thus eliminating the middlemen.

RISING INCOMES

How well the model works can be seen in the life of farmers such as 38-year-old Gulab Singh Varma. His two-room house is well-appointed by the standards of Bhaukhedi, the village of 3,000 where he lives in Sehore district, Madhya Pradesh. In pride of place, next to a bright-red velvet sofa, is the e-chaupal computer, complete with speakers, printer, a satellite connection, and two sets of solar-powered batteries.

Before e-chaupal was set up, he says, farmers would spend three days traveling to the nearest market to sell their produce and never got a fair price. Then they would buy fertilizer and pesticides at premium rates and return home feeling cheated. “Now it takes a few hours to make a sale in the local market,” Varma says, “because we know the prices a day ahead of time, and we negotiate with the local market on the Web site.” Selling produce to ITC, thanks to the direct connection, nets the farmers 5% to 15% more than in the traditional marketplace. ITC is now building large, rural Wal-Mart-like supermarkets where farmers come to sell their produce and buy everything they need, from tractors to cell phones. “Since e-chaupal began, the farmers’ incomes have increased by 25% to 30%,” estimates Varma.

Through 2010, when ITC hopes to reach its goal of 100,000 villages participating in e-chaupal, the company will spend $100 million a year on developing this network. None of the competition, including U.S. rival Cargill Corp., can match this head start. Consultant Hagel worries that Western companies are “far too complacent about the changes and won’t have the capabilities to respond” to such business models.

Will Western multinationals find themselves confronting model Indian companies outside India as well? For now, Indian companies are venturing overseas more slowly and cheaply than their state-backed Chinese counterparts. The Indians are making $1 million to $100 million acquisitions to learn about foreign markets or to tap capabilities for their own operations.

But that doesn’t mean there won’t be surprises. “Companies out of India and China will be disruptive business models, coming at you in ways you can’t anticipate,” says Jayant Sinha, author of a recent McKinsey & Co. study of globalizing companies from the developing world. Already, India’s ICICI Bank, with $42 billion in assets, is adapting the outsourcing model to finance. It has turned itself into a low-cost consumer bank by building its own high-tech back office and is expanding in rural India by setting up automated teller machines in villages.

Now, ICICI is using that technological edge abroad, opening up a wholly owned bank subsidiary in Canada. By operating its low-cost back end in India, the bank is passing on those benefits to locals who bank through the Internet in the form of interest some 35 to 75 basis points higher than what’s available at other Canadian banks. The product has been so popular that the bank already has 22,000 customers, with 1,500 new ones signing up every week. Indian companies like ICICI can successfully take their models overseas because they are firmly anchored to their home market. A home market that is constantly being reinvented.

India’s Corporate Innovators

LEGEND FOR CHART: A – COMPANYB – BUSINESSC – REVENUES** (BILLIONS)D – PROFITS** (MILLIONS)E – INNOVATION A                        B                      C        DE Bharti Tele-Ventures     Cellular operator     $1.8     $330Outsourced core networking services so management could focuson marketing and sales Tata Motors              Auto maker             4.5      318Developing a $2,200 passenger car, to be distributed in a kitand assembled at point of sale ITC                      Agribusiness           3.0      503Employing e-commerce to produce and procure raw materials inRural areas ICICI Bank*              Banking               22.8*     460Using lower-cost business processing in India to offer higherinterest rates to foreign customers TCS                      Software               2.2      471Constructed a computer-aided adult-literacy program that usesSymbols to teach 500 words in 10 weeks * Deposits** Fiscal year ended Mar. 31, 2005Data: BusinessWeek

PHOTO (COLOR): TALK IS CHEAP: To cut costs, Bharti outsourced its entire network

PHOTO (COLOR): IN A FLASH: ITC’s intranet changed the way farmers sell their produce

~~~~~~~~

By Manjeet Kripalani

 

Copyright of Business Week is the property of McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
Source: Business Week, 8/22/2005 Issue 3948, p64, 3p, 1 chart, 3c.
Item Number: 17907476

 

Get a 5 % discount on an order above $ 150
Use the following coupon code :
2020Discount
oster children and special education
abc model

Category: Homework Help

Our Services:
Order a customized paper today!